But Gary [Glitter] has not tried to sell them [images of child pornography], not tried to show them in public or anything like that. It were for his own gratification.
Whether it was right or wrong is, of course, it's up to him as a person. But they didn't do anything wrong but they are then demonised.
If you said to that copper, what's Gary Glitter done wrong? Well nothing really. He's just sat at home watching dodgy films.
What It Means
This is a placeholder explanation generated by the low-overhead model. It interprets "But Gary [Glitter] has not tried to sell them [images of child pornography], not tried to show them in public or anything like that. It were for his own gratification.
Whether it was right or wrong is, of course, it's up to him as a person. But they didn't do anything wrong but they are then demonised.
If you said to that copper, what's Gary Glitter done wrong? Well nothing really. He's just sat at home watching dodgy films." in the context of "From a sound recording (2000) used in Exposure: The Other Side Of Jimmy Savile, as cited in "Jimmy Savile claimed paedophile Gary Glitter 'did nothing wrong'", The Daily Telegraph (1 October 2012)" to mean that wisdom is timeless.
Tags
About Jimmy Savile