What people kept saying is how can a minister who says she doesn’t believe in God be a minister in the Christian church? People were confused, and so what we thought was that we need to bring some kind of clarity to the situation. I’ve had a lot of people getting in touch with me, both who support Gretta and those who are wondering why the church hasn’t done something long ago on this one. What I keep saying is that the review is an opportunity for us to do the investigation and then to know at the end of it good reasons why she should be allowed to continue as a minister with the United Church, or have good reasons why she should not be.”
What It Means
This is a placeholder explanation generated by the low-overhead model. It interprets "What people kept saying is how can a minister who says she doesn’t believe in God be a minister in the Christian church? People were confused, and so what we thought was that we need to bring some kind of clarity to the situation. I’ve had a lot of people getting in touch with me, both who support Gretta and those who are wondering why the church hasn’t done something long ago on this one. What I keep saying is that the review is an opportunity for us to do the investigation and then to know at the end of it good reasons why she should be allowed to continue as a minister with the United Church, or have good reasons why she should not be.”" in the context of "David Allen Meet the United Church minister who came out as an atheist (February 2015)" to mean that wisdom is timeless.