The exceptional nature of its limitations places in a strong light the general conception that liberty of the press, historically considered and taken up by the Federal Constitution, has meant, principally, although not exclusively, immunity from previous restraints or censorship.

What It Means

This is a placeholder explanation generated by the low-overhead model. It interprets "The exceptional nature of its limitations places in a strong light the general conception that liberty of the press, historically considered and taken up by the Federal Constitution, has meant, principally, although not exclusively, immunity from previous restraints or censorship." in the context of "Charles Evans Hughes, (Near v. Minnesota, 1931)." to mean that wisdom is timeless.